Saturday, 11 August 2012

Acer TravelMate 8204WLMi Review

Acer TravelMate 8204WLMi Review (pics, specs)

By artem1985il, NotebookReview Staff | Thursday, February 23, 2006 | 99311 Reads
 
22
 



Acer TravelMate 8204WLMi Review (compared to Sager 5720)

Acer 8204 WLMi (view large image)
The notebook reviewed is one of the most popular laptops of the season -- Acer TravelMate 8204WLMi. This business desktop replacement houses the latest components -- from Intel's new Core Duo processor to ATi's Mobility Radeon X1600 GPU -- in a sleek and sexy case.
Here's the specifications of the 8204 reviewed:
  • Intel Core Duo 2.0GHz
  • 15.4" WSXGA+ LCD (1680x1050, non-glossy)
  • ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 256MB GDDR3
  • 2GB PC4200 533DDR2 RAM
  • 120GB 5400RPM SATA HD
  • 8x Combo with DVD+R DL
  • Windows XP Professional SP2
  • Lithium Ion 9-Cell battery
  • Intel PRO Wireless a/b/g
  • Built-in Bluetooth
  • 1 Year Acer Warranty

The Ferrari logo is just an emblem I stuck on the back to go with the carbon fiber, it does not come with the notebook (view large image)
Reasons for Buying
I was looking for a notebook under $3000 with the following qualities: good design and build quality, good gaming performance, WSXGA+ resolution screen, and something that would be able to run the upcoming Vista. I also wanted something that looked professional rather than a laptop with a car paint finish in lime green.
I was set on buying the 8204 when it was announced and resolved to sit tight until it is released. One day I ran across a PC Gamer issue which had a Sager ad. I immediately noticed the 5720 due to the slim look and the holy grail of mobile video cards -- nVidia's 7800 GTX! I ran home to research the model as I didn't know anything about Sager. After looking at the comments about the 5720 and awing over the gaming benchmarks, I decided to order one that night.
I received my 5720 in a few days and I loved everything about it -- the looks, the quality, the screen, and the performance (My review is posted here: http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?p=1250232). One thing that bothered me was the size and weight of the notebook, as well as the low battery life. I knew I was going back to school in March and it would be very inconvenient. So, as hard as it was to let it go, I talked myself into sending it back to Sager for a refund and ordering Acer's 8204.
Where and How Purchased
I ordered my 8204 from TigerDirect as they were the only store that had them in stock that night. I called about 4:30 to place the order with a live person to make sure there are no mistakes. The salesperson was very helpful and the order was a breeze...until I was transferred to Credit Card Authorizations to complete the order. I spent 42min on the call, 35 of which was on hold. But after talking to the rep and doing a 3-way with my bank, the order was complete.
I had to pay the highest price for the 8204 - $2499 plus $87 for overnight shipping. I wasn't very happy about laying out MSRP but I didn't have a choice unless I wanted to wait another week.
Build & Design
When I put the TM 8204 in my hands for the first time, I was surprised how light it is after handling my 5720, which was about 3.5 lbs heavier. The case is definitely the best I have seen due to the carbon fiber lid. The overall feel of the closed notebook was a little unsettling -- it didn't have that rock-solid feel of the Sager 5720 that I got used to. Not to imply that it was bending and crackling in my hand, but it does seem fragile.

Carbon fiber lid of the 8204 (view large image)
The screen shows quite a bit of rippling when pressing on the back of the lid, which I did not expect with carbon fiber in place. The hinges look fine but could be stronger.

Top view of 8204 (view large image)
The overall build quality of the 8204 would get nothing more than a 8/10 from me. 

Back left corner (view large image)
Screen
I loved the glossy screen on the 5720 in most cases, but the glare was killing me in a bright room. The LCD on the Acer is decent, but is not nearly as bright as the 5720 or my brother's DELL. Even with brightness on max and some tweaks with desktop overlay in Catalyst control panel, the display is quite dim. Also, you have to face the screen directly to get the best brightness.
The light leakage from the bottom of the LCD is also disappointing. I did not know what screen leakage was with my 5720, but I do now. Not only is it noticeable on black backgrounds on boot-up, it's also visible with regular usage.

Light leakage on 8204 WLMi screen (view large image)
The 1.3MP camera above the screen is a plus though. The software package it comes with tops that of Sager. You can use animated avatars that mimic your facial expressions. Facial tracking is also a unique feature. Too bad I will probably never use it.

Camera at top of screen (view large image)
The screen gets a 7/10 on this notebook.
Speakers
The sound out of the speakers is really weak without any base or surround effect. I was really pleased with the SRS WoW on the 5720, and once again, Acer lets me down.
Processor and Performance
Intel's Core Duo + 2GB RAM + X1600 are a good mix for good performance. Windows boots up about 200% faster than it did on my Sager 5720, applications start-up quickly, and multi-tasking is a bit easier with the dual core CPU.

(view large image)
As far as gaming performance -- it's actually pretty good! I was able to play Counter-Strike: Source at native resolution with everything set to high, 4XAF, and no AA. There was occasional lag but that went away with the ~20 extra fps with Shaders set to low. Battlefield 2 was ok too: I was able to run it at 1440x1050 with most settings to high and 3-4 on Medium at around 35-45fps. I am all about visuals, so I would not tolerate the textures on Med or Low, so I was pleased to find out that I could keep them at high. The 5400RPM hard drive is noticeably slower when it comes to game load times than the 7200RPM in my Sager 5720, but it's not too bad.
Benchmarks
The benchmark scores were ran without any tweaking or overclocking.
Below are the results gained from running Super Pi (ftp://pi.super-computing.org/windows/super_pi.zip), a program that forces the laptop's processor to calculate Pi to 2 million digits of accuracy.

Notebook Time
Acer TravelMate 8204WLMi (2.0GHz Core Duo)  1m 14s
Dell Inspiron e1705 (2.0GHz Core Duo)  1m 16s
 Lenovo ThinkPad T60 (2.0GHz Core Duo)  1m 18s
 IBM ThinkPad T43 (1.86 GHz Pentium M)  1m 45s
 IBM ThinkPad Z60m (2.0 GHz Pentium M)  1m 36s
 Fujitsu LifeBook N3510 (1.73 GHz Pentium M)  1m 48s
 Dell Inspiron 6000D (1.6 GHz Pentium M)  1m 52s
 Dell Inspiron 600M (1.6 GHz Pentium M)  2m 10s
 HP Pavilion dv4000 (1.86 GHz Pentium M)  1m 39s
 HP DV4170us (Pentium M 1.73 GHz)  1m 53s
 Sony VAIO S380 (1.86 GHz Pentium M)  1m 45s

3DMark05 results for Acer 8204 WLMi compared to other notebooks:
Notebook  3DMark 05 Results
 Acer TravelMate 8204 (2.0GHz Core Duo, ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 256MB)  4236 3DMarks / NA
 Lenovo ThinkPad T60 (2.0GHz Core Duo, ATI X1400 128MB  2092 3D Marks / 4462 CPUMarks
ThinkPad T43 (1.86GHz, ATI X300 64MB graphics)  727 3DMarks / 3414 CPUMarks
 Asus V6Va (2.13 GHz Pentium M, ATI Radeon Mobility x700 128 MB)  2530 3D Marks / 3749 CPU Marks
 Quanta KN1 (1.86 GHz Pentium M, NVIDIA GeForce Go 6600 128mb)  2,486 3DMarks / 4106 CPUMarks
 HP dv4000 (1.86GHz Pentium M, ATI X700 128MB)  2536 3D Marks / 3557 CPU Marks
 Acer TravelMate 8204WLMi (2.0GHz Core Duo, ATI X1600 256MB)  4157 3DMarks / 4812 CPU Marks
Keyboard and Touchpad

Keyboard and touchpad view (view large image)
The keyboard is one of the things I like about the Acer. The curved layout works great and was very easy to get used to. The keys are smooth and feel nice to the touch. I don't really need a num pad on the laptop, so that's one thing I don't miss about my Sager.
I almost never use the touchpad but it was smooth an easy to use the couple times I played with it.
One thing I really don't like is the lack of hardware volume controls. There is no way to adjust volume in-game without minimizing to desktop -- the function key combo does not work when I am playing games.
There are two switches on the front of the notebook -- for Bluetooth and wireless. Personally, I don't think they are practical as I never enable Bluetooth or disable wireless. They might be useful for someone, but I don't think I will ever use them.

Power button and programmable quick launch keys (view large image)
Also, there are four programmable launch buttons above the keyboard. I don't use them as it is easier to move the cursor over to the icon in my quicklaunch than to take my hand off the mouse and reach over to press one of those buttons.
Input and Output Ports:

Side views (view large image)
  • DC-in
  • RJ-11 modem
  • RJ-45 LAN
  • VGA
  • DVI (digital visual interface)
  • Headphones/speakers/line-out with SPDIF support
  • Microphone
  • Line-in
  • S-video TV-out
  • FireWire (IEEE 1394)
  • FIR (fast infrared)
  • Four USB 2.0
  • Connector for optional ezDock Docking Station

Back right side view (view large image)

Multi card reader (view large image)
Wireless
The 8204 uses Intel's PRO Wirless card, which supports a/b/g networks. The speed is excellent with my LinkSys router that sits downstairs from my location when using the Sager 5270. IR is also included as well as the standard Bluetooth module.
Battery
The TravelMate 8204 came with a 9-cell removable battery. The low-consumption CPU and video card will allow you to get up to 3.5 hours on the battery, which is almost twice of what the Sager 5720 would sustain.
Operating System and Software
The system comes pre-loaded with Windows XP Professional SP2 with Acer's Empowering Framework suite, which includes a number of utilities to control the notebooks settings for security, network, performance and others. I uninstalled all of that because I did not find any of it essential. The power management utility was the one I kept the longest, but I uninstalled it as well to shorten Windows boot time. I use Notebook Hardware Control to adjust the CPU clock speed when unplugged.
There was also a trial from Norton and a couple other value-added software, but I got rid of all of it...
Other
The notebook also comes with a couple extras you won't usually see in a laptop bundle.

Smart Card (view large image)
The Acer comes with a security card system (with 2 cards), which will add more protection to the data stored on your notebook. Also, there is a Bluetooth VoIP phone. I have not tried either and uninstalled the necessary software, so I cannot provide more info.

VoIP Phone included with Acer 8204 (view large image)
Customer Support
I have only dealt with TigerDirect so far, and there were no complications. One thing I don't like is that there is no return policy for a refund, otherwise I would have sent it back by now.
Complaints
  • So-so build quality
  • Mediocre dim screen with major light leakage
  • Heat vent is facing right hand on the mouse
  • No external volume control
  • Poor sound quality
  • Unable to return
  • Overpriced (compare to their 5672)
Praises
  • Good looks
  • Comfortable keyboard
  • Fast performance
  • Best 15.4" notebook for gaming
  • Good feature-set
  • Battery life
Conclusion
If I take everything into consideration, I am not happy with this notebook. It has too many faults for a $2500 price tag. I wish I could return it for a refund so I could buy my Sager back, but unfortunately it's not possible. I will keep it for a while and see if I learn to like it's good points, otherwise I will sell it on eBay with a $500 loss....
I would only recommend this notebook if you are looking for a light, business-like notebook that will support your games. If gaming is your main concern, go for the Sager 5720; if you want something with a dual core notebook in a fairly light package, avoid the 8204 and get something cheaper.
Pricing and Availability: Acer 8204 WLMi

Apple MacBook Pro with Retina Display Review

Apple MacBook Pro with Retina Display Review (2012)

By J.R. Nelson, NotebookReview Editor | Thursday, June 28, 2012 | 98240 Reads
Reviewer Rating:
Pros
  • Screen, screen, screen!
  • Thin
  • Strong performance
  • Excellent speakers

Cons
  • Very expensive for performance level
  • Increased costs for repair and battery replacement
  • Few applications ready for Retina at this time
  • Performance issues with some browsing
Shop MacBook Pro with Retina Display

 
39
 

Quick Take:
The MacBook Pro with Retina Display is a bit of the past and a bit of the future, wrapped up into one tasty, toasty present. Brilliant screen meets refined design.

Overview

The next-generation MacBook Pro with Retina Display - it's a mouthful of a name. Apple's latest notebook represents the culmination of a number of trends from one of the industry's most visible players - from unibody aluminum construction to soldered-in components; from solid-state storage to the much-vaunted Retina Display.
Apple clearly has a vision for where they want to take portable computing, and while impressive, it has its drawbacks, too. Let's jump into things by taking a look at the MacBook Pro's most talked about feature: its stunningly high resolution display.
Apple started the trend of ultra-high resolution screens with the iPhone 4, back in 2010. The iPhone 4's display doubled each dimension of pixels over its predecessor from 480x320 to 960x640. The iPad 3 did the same thing - the best-selling tablet jumped from 1024x768 to 2048x1536.
Apple MacBook Pro 2012 with Retina DisplayA Retina-enabled MacBook Pro follows the same trajectory. Previously, the 15-inch MacBook Pro shipped with a standard resolution of 1440x900. This new MacBook Pro, then, uses 2880x1800, which equals a more than 5 Megapixel image. In terms of sharpness, it figures out to almost 221 pixels per inch. This compares to 315ppi for the iPhone, and 264ppi for the iPad.
So why are they still called Retina I mean, "retina screens" are just a marketing concept, but there exists real science behind the nomenclature.
It has to do with how your eye works, and how you use your specific device. You hold a phone closer than a tablet, and you'll probably hold a tablet closer to you than you would your laptop. So despite the MacBook Pro employing a lower pixel density than its more mobile counterparts, it still gets to lay claim to the Retina Display name.
If you're handy with math, you can figure out that your HDTV is probably pretty close to Retina quality, in terms of your ability to distinguish between individual pixels, now.


The screen - oh my god, the screen

While the sharpness plays a role in how good the screen looks - and the new MacBook Pro's screen looks better than any other notebook that has ever existed, bar none - so does the panel technology. I want to make that clear - if display quality is paramount to you, for whatever reason, this is the only laptop you should remotely be considering. It's simply that good. Apple uses IPS screens in their next-gen MBP, just like in the iPhone and iPad. It's a welcome step up from the screens they've used in the past; as TN panels, they suffered from color distortions and poor viewing angles.
*Note - see the comments at the end of the article for a couple of notes on color accuracy.
These new screens fix all of that.
You might hope that with such a high resolution display, we've finally entered the era of resolution independence. Regrettably, it's not quite the case. As a result, Apple has been forced to hack together a way to make balance the sharpness of the display and the usability of the UI. Mind you, "hack together" makes it sound worse than it is; as these solutions go, it is really quite elegant, and quite a bit better than simply changing the DPI settings in Windows.
When you boot the MacBook Pro up for the first time and dive into the resolution settings, you'll be confronted with a new settings pane. Apple forces you to choose between two options: one is balanced by default for the Retina Display ("Best for Retina display"), while the others let you choose between five different resolution settings("Scaled").

Unlike traditional screens, there aren't any resolution numbers here. At least, not at first. Inside of the 'Scaled' option, you get to choose between five different display orientations. Larger text, which Apple says "Looks like 1024x640", one higher, "Looks like 1280x800", the 'Best for Retina' default, "Looks like 1440x900", a fourth, which "Looks like 1680x1050", and 'More Space', which "Looks like 1920x1200".
A warning pops up beneath any non-default resolution that "Using a scaled resolution may reduce performance." This is because Apple doesn't simply scale any resolution beneath 2880x1800 up to the native resolution of the panel - they do a little scaling wizardry.
For the 1680x1050 and 1920x1200 modes, OS X actually renders the display at 3360x2100 and 3840x2400, respectively. They do this in order to supersample the ultra-high (9.21MP!) resolution and maximize the clarity of the non-native resolution. Clear it is, too; it's probably the clearest screen we've seen for an LCD displaying non-native imagery.

Retina vs. non-retina

Applications that are "Retina-aware", however, get to employ even more trickery! If you're mucking about in software such as Aperture, iMovie, Final Cut Pro X, or most other Apple applications (Adobe has promised Photoshop updates, but they've not yet been released), the UI elements get doubled, but the media - photos, videos, etc. - get displayed on a 1:1 basis. If you're editing, for example, a 3000:2000 image in Aperture, you'd get to see the entire image displayed on screen, while the UI remains clearly visible. It's a neat sort of hybrid resolution that lets crafty developers really take advantage of super pixel dense displays.
Software that isn't Retina-aware, however, doesn't fare nearly as well. Anything that isn't rendered on screen by some sort of OS API looks fuzzy. That means that any web browsing, unless you use the included Safari browser, isn't going to look so hot. A lot of legacy applications, unless updated, will look similarly.

Compare this, meanwhile, with how things are handled in Microsoft's Windows OS. When you install Windows via Apple's Boot Camp software, then install the Boot Camp drivers, Apple makes a few modifications for you. The DPI is changed, for example, making fonts and some UI elements look larger than normal - it's a pretty clunky result.
You do have a lot more freedom to set how you want things displayed, however, including the ability to push the screen to its native, 2880x1800, eye-searing max. Seriously. Eye-searing. It's sort of interesting, in an academic sense, to run the OS at that resolution, but it's pretty uncomfortable. Windows doesn't by default allow you to pick a pixel-quartered resolution of 1440x900, either, which is puzzling. Unless you really need to stay in Windows, you should probably avoid it; unlike prior Intel-based Macs, OS X just plain looks better.
The real exception to this is Metro. The Start Screen and Metro applications look gorgeous at the full 2880x1800 display, with things rendered at human-readable sizes. Everything just looks pretty. Still, Metro isn't supremely useful on the desktop quite just yet, but that's a story for another day.
Apple MacBook Pro 2012 with Retina DisplayApple MacBook Pro 2012 with Retina Display

Viewing angles Solid - you can lay the display flat against a table and not experience the color shift and distortion you find on other screens. Backlighting was similarly commendable, with zero noticeable light bleeds - everything is really quite surprisingly uniform.
According to our measurements, the average static contrast ratio was roughly 945:1, which is quite good for a mobile display. Parts of the screen ranged from 827:1 to 1048:1, but on the whole, the differences are completely unnoticeable to the naked eye.
One of the specifications picked up by a lot of tech blogs and papers after the WWDC announcement was the fact that the new MacBook Pro with Retina (abbreviated herein as rMBP for brevity) featured a "less glossy" screen. It's true - the display is less glossy. That's because Apple finally managed to rid themselves of that ridiculous extra panel of glass in front of the LCD.
Apple MacBook Pro 2012 with Retina DisplayApple MacBook Pro 2012 with Retina Display
I have never been a fan of pushing screens in that direction, since it adds a frustrating amount of extra gloss, shine and reflection, not to mention thickness and weight. In this respect, the rMBP is very similar to the MacBook Airs. The new panel has glass bonded directly to the screen. It's still glossy, but it's actually usable at angles, unlike some MacBooks in the recent past (glare monsters).

Impressively thin

I know it seems overboard, but I really can't speak highly enough about the display on this computer. This is the measure by which future displays will be judged.
Apple MacBook Pro 2012 with Retina DisplayThe rest of the rMBP's design is still impressive, if subdued. It looks mostly like its predecessor, save for the fact that it's about a quarter of an inch thinner. Coming in at 0.71 inches, the new MacBook Pro is just three hundredths of an inch thicker than the MacBook Air line - of course, the rMBP doesn't follow the same wedge-shaped design; it runs straight in all directions, apart from some tapering at the edge.
It all adds up to an impressively thin profile. There are definitely thinner notebooks on the market, but none that can match the same feature set. Similarly, the new rMBP weighs 4.46 pounds - not the lightest we've seen for a 15-inch notebook, but still impressive. Users used to an old MBP will appreciate the weight reduction, while those jumping ship from a MacBook Air may find it a bit clunky in comparison.
As a whole, the build quality is impressive; the machine feels like a solid block of aluminum. There's little to no give anywhere on the computer, and the hinges are stiff without being exasperating. Fun note: thanks to the engineering upgrades to the screen, there wasn't an easy way for Apple to blaze their logo all over the bottom of the bezel, and so it got stuck on the underside of the machine. The pure minimalism of the design is impressive, as a result.

Ports and features

The MacBook Pro with Retina Display has a full two Thunderbolt ports. This underused high-speed interconnect is looking to come into its own over the next year, as we've seen a number of companies prepping compatible products for release (let's hope they actually make it to market).
Apple MacBook Pro 2012 with Retina DisplayApple MacBook Pro 2012 with Retina Display
These can serve as mini-DisplayPort ports, too, with no special adapter required, save for converting mini-DP to DP. They're located on the left side of the notebook. An HDMI port on the right, the first on an Apple portable, means that you can hook up three external displays. The built-in screen makes it four. I have a USB 3.0 - HDMI adapter sitting here, but haven't tried it yet; five displays would be weirdly impressive. The MagSafe adapter has been shrunk down to fit into the smaller chassis; Apple replaced the "L" style connector to the previous "T" style one.
While the "T" style adapter had issues with fraying, it looks like Apple addressed that by sheathing the connector in the same aluminum as the rest of the notebook.
Speaking of USB, Apple has finally made the jump from USB 2.0 to USB 3.0. It has taken them an unforgivably long time to make the switch, which was delayed until Intel added support natively into their Ivy Bridge chipsets. There's one USB port on either side. A headphone jack on the left and SD card slot on the right round out the port selection.
There is no optical drive on this notebook. It's part of the way that Apple saved both thickness and weight, and given the trends, unlikely to be missed by most people. OS X still supports the ability to use the optical drive on another networked computer, however, so between that and cheap USB drives, you should be good to go if you really need to read discs.
Apple MacBook Pro 2012 with Retina DisplayImage courtesy of iFixit
The expansion issue is probably Apple's most controversial decision. That is to say, the new MacBook Pro with Retina Display can't be upgraded. Period. The RAM is soldered down, the CPU is soldered down. The GPU is on-board. The SSD features a proprietary shape and port (though at least it isn't soldered down, too). Even the battery, which lost easy swappability with the advent of the unibody MacBook construction, is glued directly to the chassis.
OWC and other companies will probably come up with a compatible third-party SSD, just like they did with the Air. That does little to change the static nature of the rest of the machine - you'd better decide up front how much memory you're going to need.
Fortunately, 8GB of RAM is the default shipping option - which it should be, at that price - and for most people, that's going to be more than enough. Despite what many enthusiasts think, most people never bother upgrading the memory on their laptops, and RAM, past the first weeks of ownership, rarely out and out fails.
What is most regrettable about this new design is the battery. Since Apple glues the battery straight onto the body of the machine, getting the battery replaced means that the entire top portion of the machine will need to be replaced. That brings extra cost, which gets passed directly onto the consumer - in this case, it'll be a $199 fee, or $70 more than the other portables. Even though heavy use should see three or more years out of the battery before noticeable degradation sets in, it's an annoying principle.

Lenovo IdeaPad Z580 Review


Lenovo IdeaPad Z580 Review: Almost The Perfect Budget Laptop

By Charles P. Jefferies, NotebookReview Staff | Monday, July 30, 2012 | 19229 Reads
Reviewer Rating:
Pros
  • Nice design
  • Good performance
  • Solid keyboard
  • Well priced

Cons
  • Low screen resolution
  • Slight fan whine
Shop IdeaPad Z580

 
0
 

Quick Take:
The Z580 represents a great value thanks to a combination of good build quality, good performance, and six hour battery life.
This multimedia-friendly 15.6-inch desktop replacement has good looks and a numeric keypad. Is this the ideal budget laptop for families and students? Read our in-depth review to find out.
Overview
When Lenovo launched the IdeaPad line of consumer laptops back in 2008 more than a few people dismissed the IdeaPads as little more than than a cheaper alternative to Lenovo's popular ThinkPad line of business notebooks. True, the IdeaPads have more plastic than their ThinkPad cousins and there are no business-friendly features like docking station connectors or slice batteries. But the IdeaPad line was never designed for the world of business ... these laptops are meant to serve as affordable family and student PCs.
Build and Design
The IdeaPad Z580 doesn't look like a typical budget notebook with its sleek brushed aluminum palm rest and lid. The design is quite detailed too; I like the fancy speaker grille above the keyboard and the touchpad's beveled edge.
Like most Lenovo notebooks, the build quality is again surprisingly good for a budget laptop. The chassis is stiff and no ripples show up on the screen when you press in on lid from behind. Ideally a notebook's internal parts should be subjected to as little flex as possible so they can last a long time; flex is bad for circuit boards. Thankfully, the Z580 feels very solid for a consumer laptop in this price range ($500-$750). Attention to detail is another positive aspect of this notebook; there are no rough or unfinished edges.
Users looking to upgrade the Z580 will find easy access to the storage drive, RAM and wireless card through a single access panel on the bottom of the notebook. The battery is also user-replaceable.
Input and Output Ports
The Z580 has a respectable array of input/output ports including two USB 3.0 SuperSpeed ports, two USB 2.0 ports, HDMI and a media card reader. It lacks an ExpressCard slot, eSATA and DisplayPort. Still, you would be hard pressed to find a budget-priced, 15-inch consumer laptop with ExpressCard slot and DisplayPort so we can't complain too much.

Front: Status lights, media card reader

Back: Battery pack

Left: Kensington Lock slot, cooling exhaust vent, VGA, Ethernet, HDMI, 2x USB 3.0

Right: Headphone and microphone jacks, USB 2.0, tray-load DVD burner, USB 2.0, AC power jack

Keyboard and Touchpad
Lenovo's 'Chiclet' style keyboards are amongst the best out there in terms of feel. The Z580's keys have plenty of travel and are able to provide ample tactile feedback. The keys make pleasant clicking sounds which add to the feedback. The keyboard feels solid with zero flex. The layout is good; all the keys are in their expected positions; the only nuance is that the keys on the number pad are about 2/3 the size, which takes some getting used to. Keyboard backlighting is not available on the Z580.
The oversized touchpad is actually a clickpad with a press-able surface. While I still prefer a traditional touchpad with separate buttons, this clickpad is actually quite good; it doesn't take too much effort to push down and it has an excellent smooth surface. The clicks are a bit louder than I prefer but that's my only real complaint.
Screen and Speakers
The Z580's 15.6-inch display is as generic as they come. It has the lowest resolution available on a modern notebook, 1366x768; this means you'll be doing a lot of scrolling in web pages and using two windows side-by-side is impractical. The display's glossy surface is also impractical as there are a lot of reflections in well-lit areas. The quality of the display is poor; it needs a serious saturation boost as colors look lifeless; contrast isn't impressive either.

Viewing angles are narrow and result in almost immediate color distortion when tilting the display back and forth. At this price point this kind of display is expected but not welcomed; we'd prefer at least a 1600x900 resolution. I look forward to the day when 1366x768 disappears.
There are two stereo speakers located above the keyboard; despite the "Dolby Home Theater" badge they're more or less typical notebook speakers: tinny sound, almost no bass and a tendency to distort quickly at higher volume levels. The audio is somewhat adjustable via the Dobly Home Theater software interface but there is only so much you can squeeze out of small speakers.